KNOWhomo

RSS

Posts tagged with "united states"

May 9
LGBTQ* Law and Protection History

The Gif above showcases the LGBT legal changes of same-sex/gender recognized marriages in the United States from 1970-2013.

For more, check out BuzzFeedLGBT’s article

LGBTQ* Law and Protection History

The Gif above showcases the LGBT legal changes of same-sex/gender recognized marriages in the United States from 1970-2013.

For more, check out BuzzFeedLGBT’s article

Anti-Bullying Laws in the American School System
Maps provided by GLSEN

Anti-Bullying Laws in the American School System

Maps provided by GLSEN

LGBTQ* Political Cartoons

‘Change’ comes in time? BY ROB TORNOE

LGBTQ* Political Cartoons

‘Change’ comes in time? BY ROB TORNOE

Mar 3
LBGTQ* Political Cartoons

Defined by those who comprise our population…

(Political Comic by  MILT PRIGGEE,) 

LBGTQ* Political Cartoons

Defined by those who comprise our population…

(Political Comic by  MILT PRIGGEE,) 

Feb 7
LBGTQ* Political Cartoons
Cupid and the month of Love

LBGTQ* Political Cartoons

Cupid and the month of Love

LGBTQ* Odd/Off-Topic History
Outlawing Cross-Dressing
Anti-cross-dressing laws passed heavily in the United States during the mid-nineteenth century.
San Francisco’s 1863 Ordinance:
If any person shall appear in a public place in a state of nudity, or in a dress not belonging to his or her sex, or in an indecent or lewd dress, or shall make any indecent exposure of his or her person, or be found guilty of any lewd or indecent act or behavior, or shall exhibit or perform any indecent, immoral or lewd play, or other representation, he should be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction, shall pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars.
$500.00 (1863) = $8805 (2010 - estimated)
( text: Susan Stryker Transgender History
   Conversion based on 1863 holding a $17.61 = $1.00 (2010)
  portrait: Francis Martin Drexel (1792-1863) Double Portrait 1822 )

LGBTQ* Odd/Off-Topic History

Outlawing Cross-Dressing

Anti-cross-dressing laws passed heavily in the United States during the mid-nineteenth century.

San Francisco’s 1863 Ordinance:

If any person shall appear in a public place in a state of nudity, or in a dress not belonging to his or her sex, or in an indecent or lewd dress, or shall make any indecent exposure of his or her person, or be found guilty of any lewd or indecent act or behavior, or shall exhibit or perform any indecent, immoral or lewd play, or other representation, he should be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction, shall pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars.

$500.00 (1863) = $8805 (2010 - estimated)

( text: Susan Stryker Transgender History

   Conversion based on 1863 holding a $17.61 = $1.00 (2010)

  portrait: Francis Martin Drexel (1792-1863) Double Portrait 1822 )